The ongoing conflict between stakeholders and the Central Bank
of Nigeria over the export repatriation policy, which came into force in
February 2015, has forced some non-oil exporters to abandon the sector, while
others have gone underground to carry out informal exports, our correspondent
has gathered.
The CBN had in a circular signed by its Director, Trade and
Exchange Department, Olakanmi Gbadamosi, on February 19, 2015, mandated all
authorised dealers to repatriate the proceeds of oil and non-oil exports into
the export proceeds domiciliary accounts of the respective exporters.
The circular stipulated 90 days for the repatriation of the oil
export proceeds and 180 days for non-oil export proceeds.
According to the
Coordinator, Agribusiness, Community of Agricultural Stakeholders of Nigeria,
Mr. Sotonye Anga, the policy operates in such a way that exporters remit
dollars to the government and get paid in naira at the official exchange rate
of N199/dollar.
“We pay dollars
into the domiciliary accounts and when it is time to withdraw, they pay us in
naira at the official exchange rate,” Anga said.
The exporters had
immediately after it came out opposed the policy, maintaining that it was not
good for the economy and not in tandem with the transformation agenda of the
Federal Government.
Our correspondent
gathered that the situation had led to a continued drop in revenue from the
non-oil sector.
According to the
Nigerian Export Promotion Council, earnings from the sector dropped by N52.2bn
in the second quarter of 2015 from N130.4bn recorded in the second quarter of
2014 (a 39.25 per cent decrease).
The CBN Governor,
Mr. Godwin Emefiele, had earlier indicated that Nigeria recorded a decline of
$6.14bn (N1.2tn) in non-oil export receipts from $10.53bn in 2014 to $4.39bn in
2015.
A director in the
office of the Chief Executive Officer, NEPC, Mr. Olajide Ibrahim, confirmed
that the export proceeds repatriation policy was having unintended effects and
that the CBN was aware that the inflow of forex into the country was at its
lowest in recent times.
Anga said the
reason why stakeholders were frustrated with the policy was that while it had
forced local exporters to trade their dollars at the official exchange rate of
N199; people who were coming into Nigeria from other countries were exchanging
their dollar at the parallel market at the rate of N300 or more.
“These people
(foreign buyers) buy produce from the same market and farms as the local
exporters, and they already have advantage since they exchange their dollar for
N300. Thus, for every dollar the foreign buyer spends buying produce, the local
exporter stands to lose N101 since the produce is sold at the parallel market
rate,” he explained.
Operators said the
situation was compounded by commodity prices in the Nigerian market, which had
continued to rise even though prices in the global market were falling.
The National
President, Federation of Agricultural Commodity Associations of Nigeria, Dr.
Victor Iyama, said cocoa was currently selling at N800,000 per metric tonne or
$2,900. “Multiply that by N199 and see if the exporter is making a gain or
loss,” he said.
Iyama insisted that
the government could not grow exports with the policy, adding that the sector
should be liberalised and that exporters should be allowed unfettered access to
their earnings, adding that if the sector was liberalised, Nigeria would be
able to realise about $300bn annually from it.
“This form of
restriction was in place before former President Olusegun Obasanjo and the then
CBN Governor, Charles Soludo, abolished it and liberalised the sector in 2006.
They observed that the policy was ruining exports and the government was losing
revenue from the non-oil export sector. Prior to 2006, the inflow of foreign
exchange into non-oil export was less than $500m, but between 2006 and 2015, it
increased to about $4bn,” he said.
The
Director-General, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Mr. Muda Yusuf,
agrees with the operators and described the policy as a disincentive to
exporters.
Yusuf said there
was a need to review the policy and allow exporters unfettered access to their
export proceeds so that they could take advantage of the depreciation in the
value of the local currency to their benefit.
Asked if there was
a link between the low inflow of forex into the economy and the policy, Yusuf
said the CBN’s approach to the forex situation had created problems for
everybody, including the exporters.
“The entire
approach of the CBN to the forex situation is creating problems for everybody,
because the policy is not encouraging the inflow of forex,” he stated.
The Commissioner
for Economic Development, Akwa Ibom State, Dr. Emmanuel Onwioduokit, faulted
the CBN’s approach, noting that it was what was used in the 1980s, which did
not work.
Onwioduokit, who
was an economic analyst with the CBN before his appointment as a commissioner,
said the country was only going to end up losing all the money it was trying to
preserve with the kind of policies that the central bank was rolling out to
conserve forex.
The commissioner
said exporters should be allowed to buy and sell at whatever price they deemed
fit since there was a restriction on the allocation of foreign exchange to
people at the official window and since the exchange rate was unstable.
“Every other price
is dictated by the parallel market and people selling produce will always quote
their prices to reflect what is being sold at the parallel market. The currency
is not stable, you may buy something today and tomorrow when you go back, the
price has increased,” he stated.
A professor of
Economics and Director, Centre for Continuing Education, Olabisi Onabanjo
University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Sheriffdeen Tella, said nothing was wrong
with the policy as long as exporters were allowed to withdraw their money in
foreign currencies.
He added that the
exporters were complaining because there was a widening gap between the
parallel market and the official exchange rate.
Reacting, the
Director, Corporate Communications, CBN, Mr. Ibrahim Mu’azu, said, “Exports are
done through the interbank market and not through the parallel market. This is
why the exchange rate can’t be based on the parallel market rate.
“Exporters are
supposed to repatriate their proceeds through the banks that financed the
exports. But there was a time some exporters were diverting the export
proceeds, rather than repatriate them.”
But Iyama faulted
Muazu’s assertion, noting that the interbank market did not operate in farms
where people go to buy produce. “What do farmers know about the interbank
market?” he asked.
He also disagreed
with the CBN spokesperson about his claim that the exporters were supposed to
repatriate the proceeds through the banks that financed the exports, noting
that not all exporters were financed by the banks.
http://www.punchng.com/exporters-lose-n78bn-to-dollar-restriction-others/
I think repatriating funds back to Nigeria is a good policy but not allowing the exporters withdraw their cash is where the problem lies. I really hope this present govt will look into it so as to encourage the exporters
ReplyDelete